[Oa-italia] Elsevier restringe ulterioramente l'auto-archiviazione e le licenze CC

Ven 22 Maggio 2015 09:09:16 CEST

Cara Rosa,
aggiungerei, come è già stato fatto sulla lista Lib-License, l'aspetto
abbastanza stupefacente della retroattività della polic, che potrebbe
indurre Elsevier a chiedere alle università di mezzo mondo di oscurare o
rimuovere gli articoli già pubblicati negli Institutional repositories nel
rispetto della precedente policy.
Ezio

2015-05-21 20:55 GMT+02:00 Rosa Maiello <rosa_maiello a virgilio.it>:

> Grazie Paola della segnalazione.
> Un'altra ottima ragione per firmare la petizione
> https://www.coar-repositories.org/activities/advocacy-leadership/petition-against-elseviers-sharing-policy/
>  è la minaccia di "notice and take down" fatta da Elsevier nel suo
> comunicato
> http://www.elsevier.com/connect/elsevier-updates-its-policies-perspectives-and-services-on-article-sharing
> alle "piattaforme" che non condividono con Elsevier i loro dati:
> " We are committed to collaborative development of standard approaches to
> cross-platform usage sharing and ask hosting platforms to share this
> information with us when the systems are in place to do so easily. This
> will enable us to report consolidated usage back to authors and their
> institutions and provide more intelligent recommendations to users of our
> platforms.
> It will take some time to develop some of these services and for hosting
> platforms to implement them. For those hosting platforms that signal they
> agree in principle with this plan, and who wish to work in partnership with
> us, we will in the interim condone sharing on their platforms that is not
> fully aligned with our policies.
> For those platforms that do not wish to work in partnership with Elsevier,
> as we noted in 2013 we do from time to time send and receive takedown
> notices when our scans reveal that an article has been – usually
> inadvertently – shared in other ways".
> Che le piattaforme in questione non siano solo Academia.eu e simili, ma
> anche i repository degli atenei lo si capisce leggendo più avanti.
> Risultato: controllo totale che Elsevier potrà avere sulla circolazione
> dei "suoi" articoli, ma tecnicamente il controllo sarà possibile anche su
> tutto quanto è depositato nelle piattaforme, e in proposito ricordo cosa
> dice il W3C su API e privacy:
> http://www.w3.org/TR/dap-privacy-reqs/.
> Tutto questo tracciamento viene ovviamente presentato come un vantaggio
> per gli autori, per una più capillare rilevazione dei loro indici
> citazionali. Per certi versi (il verso degli indici citazionali), potrebbe
> anche esserlo. Dubito però che alla lunga la libertà di ricerca possa
> trarre vantaggio dall'espansione del controllo sui suoi prodotti da parte
> di un oligopolio commerciale.
>
> Rosa Maiello
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Thu, 21 May 2015 12:09:16 +0200
> From: Paola Gargiulo <p.gargiulo a cineca.it>
> Subject: [Oa-italia] Elsevier restringe ulterioramente
>         l'auto-archiviazione e le licenze CC
> To: oa-italia a openarchives.it
> Message-ID: <555DAECC.1070206 a cineca.it>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> SPARC e COAR hanno elaborato una dichiarazione in cui si denuncia la
> gravità delle ulteriori restrizioni  che Elsevier ha deciso di praticare
> sulla ripubblicazione degli articoli (con embargo fino a 48 mesi per alcune
> sue riviste) e sulle  licenze  da applicare ai post-print  che di fatto
> impediscono qualsiasi riuso ( CC BY, NC, ND) SPARC e COAR hanno elaborato
> una dichiarazione in cui si denuncia la gravità delle ulteriori
> restrizioni  che Elsevier ha deciso di praticare sulla ripubblicazione
> degli articoli (con embargo fino a 48 mesi per alcune sue riviste) e sulle
> licenze  da applicare ai post-print  che di fatto impediscono qualsiasi
> riuso ( CC BY, NC, ND)
> https://www.coar-repositories.org/activities/advocacy-leadership/petition-against-elseviers-sharing-policy/
>
> Da far circolare e sottoscrivere.
>
> Paola
>
> Da far circolare e sottoscrivere.
>
> Paola
>
>
> Please excuse the cross posting.
>
> For Immediate Release
> Wednesday, May 20, 2015
>
> Contact:
> Ranit Schmelzer (SPARC)
> 202-538-1065
> sparcmedia a arl.org <mailto:sparcmedia a arl.org> Katharina MÃ¼ller (COAR)
> 49 551 39-22215
> office a coar-repositories.org <mailto:office a coar-repositories.org>
>
> -------------
>
> *NEW POLICY FROM ELSEVIER IMPEDES OPEN ACCESS AND SHARING*
>
> /Global coalition of organizations denounce the policy and urge Elsevier
> to revise it/
>
> *Washington, DC and Gottingen, Germany*Elsevier new sharing and
> hostingpolicy <
> http://www.elsevier.com/connect/elsevier-updates-its-policies-perspectives-and-services-on-article-sharing
> >represents
> a significant obstacle to the dissemination and use of research knowledge,
> and creates unnecessary barriers for Elsevier published authors in
> complying with fundersâ€™ open access policies, according to an analysis by
> the Scholarly Publishing and Academic Resources Coalition
> (SPARC) and the Confederation of Open Access Repositories (COAR).
>
> Elsevier's policy is in direct conflict with the global trend towards open
> access and serves only to dilute the benefits of openly sharing research
> results,â€  said Heather Joseph, Executive Director of SPARC and Kathleen
> Shearer, Executive Director of COAR, in a joint statement. â€œElsevier
> claims that the policy advances sharing but in fact, it does the opposite.
> We strongly urge Elsevier to revise it.
>
> The new stance marks a significant departure from Elsevier's initial
> policy, established in 2004, which allowed authors to self-archive their
> final accepted manuscripts of peer-reviewed articles in institutional
> repositories without delay.  While the stated purpose of the new revision
> is, in part, to roll back an ill-conceived 2012 amendment prohibiting
> authors at institutions that have adopted campus-wide Open Access policies
> from immediate self archiving, the net result of the new policy is that
> Elsevier has placed greater restrictions on sharing articles.
>
> Twenty-three groups today released the following statement in opposition
> to the policy:
>
> €œOn April 30, 2015, Elsevier announced a new sharing and hosting policy
> for Elsevier journal articles. This policy represents a significant
> obstacle to the dissemination and use of research knowledge, and creates
> unnecessary barriers for Elsevier published authors in complying with
> fundersâ€™ open access policies. In addition, the policy has been adopted
> without any evidence that immediate sharing of articles has a negative
> impact on publishersâ€™ subscriptions.
>
> €œDespite the claim by Elsevier that the policy advances sharing, it
> actually does the opposite. The policy imposes unacceptably long embargo
> periods of up to 48 months for some journals. It also requires authors to
> apply a "non-commercial and no derivative works" license for each article
> deposited into a repository, greatly inhibiting the re-use value of these
> articles. Any delay in the open availability of research articles curtails
> scientific progress and places unnecessary constraints on delivering the
> benefits of research back to the public.
>
> â€œFurthermore, the policy applies to "all articles previously published
> and those published in the future" making it even more punitive for both
> authors and institutions. This may also lead to articles that are currently
> available being suddenly embargoed and inaccessible to readers.
>
> As organizations committed to the principle that access to information
> advances discovery, accelerates innovation and improves education, we
> support the adoption of policies and practices that enable the immediate,
> barrier free access to and reuse of scholarly articles. This policy is in
> direct conflict with the global trend towards open access and serves only
> to dilute the benefits of openly sharing research results.
>
> €œWe strongly urge Elsevier to reconsider this policy and we encourage
> other organizations and individuals to express their opinions.â€
>
> *The statement is availablehere
> <
> https://www.coar-repositories.org/activities/advocacy-leadership/petition-against-elseviers-sharing-policy/
> >and
> we welcome others to show their support by also endorsing it.*
>
> The statement has been signed by the following groups:
>
> COAR: Confederation of Open Access Repositories
> SPARC: Scholarly Publishing and Academic Resources Coalition
> ACRL: Association of College and Research Libraries
> ALA: American Library Association
> ARL: Association of Research Libraries
> Association of Southeastern Research Libraries Australian Open Access
> Support Group
> IBICT: Brazilian Institute of Information in Science and Technology
> CARL: Canadian Association of Research Libraries
> CLACSO: Consejo Latinoamericano de Ciencias Sociales
> COAPI: Coalition of Open Access Policy Institutions Creative Commons
> Creative Commons (USA) EIFL Electronic Frontier Foundation Greater Western
> Library Alliance
> LIBER: European Research Library Association National Science Library,
> Chinese Academy of Sciences OpenAIRE Open Data Hong Kong Research Libraries
> UK
> SANLiC: South African National Licensing Consortium University of St
> Andrews Library
>
>
> SPARC  the Scholarly Publishing and Academic Resources Coalition, is an
> international alliance of academic and research libraries working to
> correct imbalances in the scholarly publishing system. Developed by the
> Association of Research Libraries, SPARC has become a catalyst for change.
> Its pragmatic focus is to stimulate the emergence of new scholarly
> communication models that expand the dissemination of scholarly research
> and reduce financial pressures on libraries. More information can be found
> athttp://www.sparc.arl.org <http://www.sparc.arl.org/>.
>
> COAR, the Confederation of Open Access Repositories, is an international
> association with over 100 members and partners from five continents
> representing universities, research institutions, government research
> funders, and others. COARâ€™s mission is to enhance the visibility and
> application of research outputs through a global network of Open Access
> digital repositories. COAR brings together the major repository initiatives
> in order to align policies and practices and acts as a global voice for the
> repository community.
>
>
> --
> Paola Gargiulo
> International Business Development Unit
> IT Solutions for Institutional Research
> Via R. Sanzio 4, I-20090 Segrate MI, Italy email:p.gargiulo a cineca.it
> phone +39 02 26995-218 mobile + 39 328 9507 128 skype paolafoca
>
> -------------- parte successiva -------------- Un allegato HTML è stato
> rimosso...
> URL:
> http://openarchives.it/pipermail/oa-italia/attachments/20150521/09a68c59/attachment.html
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> OA-Italia mailing list
> OA-Italia a openarchives.it
> http://openarchives.it/mailman/listinfo/oa-italia
>
>
> Fine di Digest di OA-Italia, Volume 104, Numero 8
> *************************************************
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OA-Italia mailing list
> OA-Italia a openarchives.it
> http://openarchives.it/mailman/listinfo/oa-italia
> PLEIADI: http://www.openarchives.it/pleiadi/

-- 
dr. Ezio Tarantino
*SBS Sistema Bibliotecario Sapienza*
Responsabile acquisizione risorse elettroniche
Sapienza Università di Roma

tel.06 4991(2) 3662
mailto:ezio.tarantino a uniroma1.it <ezio.tarantino a uniroma1.it>
-------------- parte successiva --------------
Un allegato HTML è stato rimosso...
URL: <http://liste.cineca.it/pipermail/oa-italia/attachments/20150522/410b94aa/attachment.html>