[Oa-italia] [Fwd: [GOAL] Survey on open access in FP7]

Elena Giglia elena.giglia a unito.it
Gio 26 Gen 2012 16:40:08 CET


Giro alla lista perche di interesse.
Buona lettura!
eg

--
dott.ssa Elena Giglia
Responsabile Progetti Open Access
Sistema Bibliotecario di Ateneo
Università degli Studi di Torino
via Michelangelo, 27
10126 Torino
011.6705309
Pubblicazioni e presentazioni in Open Access su E-LIS:
http://tinyurl.com/6gbgaj2
___________
Again, you can't connect the dots looking forward; you can only connect
them looking backwards. So you have to trust that the dots will somehow
connect in your future [S.Jobs]


-------------------------- Messaggio originale ---------------------------
Oggetto: [GOAL]  Survey on open access in FP7
Da:      "Steve Hitchcock" <sh94r a ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Data:    Gio, 26 Gennaio 2012, 2:14 pm
A:       "Global Open Access List (Successor of AmSci)" <goal a eprints.org>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Interesting results from this survey, some highlighted below from
extensive Executive summary.

Survey on open access in FP7
European Commission, 7th Framework Programme, (2012)
http://ec.europa.eu/research/science-society/document_library/pdf_06/survey-on-open-access-in-fp7_en.pdf

The European Commission launched in August 2008 the open access pilot in
FP7. It concerns all new projects from that date in seven FP7 research
areas. Grant beneficiaries are expected to deposit peer-reviewed research
articles or final manuscripts resulting from their projects into an online
repository and make their best efforts to ensure open access to those
articles within a set period of time after publication. In addition to the
pilot, FP7 rules of participation also allow all projects to have open
access fees eligible for reimbursement during the time of the grant
agreement. The EU-funded portal OpenAIRE (‘Open Access Infrastructure for
Research in Europe’) has supported the pilot since 2009, with mechanisms
for the identification, deposit, access to and monitoring of FP7-funded
articles.

Selected results

Almost 70 % of respondents with an opinion think that it is better to use
self-archiving rather than open access publishing to satisfy the open
access requirement in FP7.  Three quarters of those respondents with an
opinion would agree or strongly agree with an open access mandate for data
in their research area, providing that all relevant aspects (e.g. ethics,
confidentiality, intellectual property) have been considered and
addressed.


Steve Hitchcock
WAIS Group, Building 32
School of Electronics and Computer Science
University of Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK
Email: sh94r a ecs.soton.ac.uk
Twitter: http://twitter.com/stevehit
Connotea: http://www.connotea.org/user/stevehit
Tel: +44 (0)23 8059 9379    Fax: +44 (0)23 8059 9379



_______________________________________________
GOAL mailing list
GOAL a eprints.org
http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/goal






Maggiori informazioni sulla lista OA-Italia