<div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div>Perché non provare una nuova forma di politica Open?</div><div><a href="http://bjoern.brembs.net/2018/11/maybe-try-another-kind-of-mandate/">http://bjoern.brembs.net/2018/11/maybe-try-another-kind-of-mandate/</a></div><div><br></div><div>
If groups of funders, such as <a href="https://www.coalition-s.org/">cOAlition S</a>,
coordinated their technical requirements as they have been coordinating
their individual mandates, the resulting infrastructure requirements
would include <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FAIR_data">FAIR</a> principles, which would lead to a decentralized, interoperable <a href="http://bjoern.brembs.net/2015/04/what-should-a-modern-scientific-infrastructure-look-like/">infrastructure</a>. under the <a href="https://cameronneylon.net/blog/principles-for-open-scholarly-infrastructures/">governance</a>
of the scientific community. As this infrastructure is intended to
replace current subscription publishing with a platform that integrates
our text-based narratives with our data and code, it would be
straightforward for the funders to suggest that an obvious source of
funds for the required infrastructure would be subscriptions. as most
scholarly articles are <a href="http://bjoern.brembs.net/2016/12/so-your-institute-went-cold-turkey-on-publisher-x-what-now/">available without subscriptions</a> anyway and implementing the infrastructure is <a href="http://bjoern.brembs.net/2015/06/what-goes-into-making-a-scientific-manuscript-public/">much</a> <a href="http://bjoern.brembs.net/2016/01/how-much-should-a-scholarly-article-cost-the-taxpayer/">cheaper,</a>
on average, than subscriptions, the implementation should be possible
without disruption and with considerable cost reductions for the
institutions. If an institution considers their library to be the
traditional place where the output of scholars is curated, made
accessible and archived, then there would not even have to be a
redirection of funds from library subscriptions to different
infrastructure units – the money would stay within the libraries. But of
course, institutions would in principle remain free to source the funds
any way they see fit. <br></div><div><br></div><div>Da leggere!</div><div>cari saluti</div><div>eg<br></div><div><br>-- <br><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div><span style="color:rgb(102,102,102)">dr. Elena Giglia<span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif"><br>Unità di progetto Open Access<br>Direzione Ricerca e Terza Missione<br>Universita' degli Studi di Torino<br>tel. +39.011.670<b>.4191</b></span><br></span></div><div><span style="color:rgb(102,102,102)">Skype: egiglia<br></span></div><span style="color:rgb(102,102,102)"><a href="http://www.oa.unito.it" target="_blank">www.oa.unito.it </a><br></span></div><div dir="ltr"><span style="color:rgb(102,102,102)"><br></span></div><div><span style="color:rgb(102,102,102)"><b>NOAD OpenAIRE Italy</b></span></div><div><span style="color:rgb(102,102,102)"><a href="https://www.openaire.eu/" target="_blank">https://www.openaire.eu/</a></span></div><div><span style="color:rgb(102,102,102)"><a href="mailto:noad-it@openaire.eu" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">noad-it@openaire.eu</a></span></div><div><span style="color:rgb(103,78,167)"></span><br></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div>