<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<br>
<div class="moz-forward-container">Reinoltro dalla lista GOAL.<br>
La novità più importante è che il BIS report cerca di correggere
la politica UK sull'OA, virata nettamente a favore del gold OA a
causa del tanto discusso Finch report: raccomanda, infatti, di
perseguire la strada del green OA.<br>
Buona lettura<br>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">Tessa Piazzini
Responsabile del Servizio di informazione e comunicazione all'utenza
Biblioteca Biomedica <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.sba.unifi.it/biomedica">http://www.sba.unifi.it/biomedica</a>
Università degli studi di Firenze
Largo Brambilla 3
50134 Firenze
tel. 055 4271137
fax 055 4221649
e-mail: <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:tessa.piazzini@unifi.it">tessa.piazzini@unifi.it</a>
Blog Bibliomedica In-forma: <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="http://www.bibliotecabiomedica.wordpress.com">www.bibliotecabiomedica.wordpress.com</a></pre>
<br>
<br>
-------- Messaggio originale --------
<table class="moz-email-headers-table" border="0" cellpadding="0"
cellspacing="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th valign="BASELINE" align="RIGHT" nowrap="nowrap">Oggetto:
</th>
<td>[GOAL] UK BIS Committee 2013 Report on Open Access</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="BASELINE" align="RIGHT" nowrap="nowrap">Data: </th>
<td>Mon, 9 Sep 2013 19:24:46 -0400</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="BASELINE" align="RIGHT" nowrap="nowrap">Mittente:
</th>
<td>Stevan Harnad <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:amsciforum@gmail.com"><amsciforum@gmail.com></a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="BASELINE" align="RIGHT" nowrap="nowrap">Rispondi-a:
</th>
<td>Global Open Access List (Successor of AmSci)
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:goal@eprints.org"><goal@eprints.org></a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="BASELINE" align="RIGHT" nowrap="nowrap">A: </th>
<td>jisc-repositories
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:JISC-REPOSITORIES@jiscmail.ac.uk"><JISC-REPOSITORIES@jiscmail.ac.uk></a>, "Global Open
Access List (Successor of AmSci)" <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:goal@eprints.org"><goal@eprints.org></a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="BASELINE" align="RIGHT" nowrap="nowrap">CC: </th>
<td>SPARC Open Access Forum <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:SPARC-OAForum@arl.org"><SPARC-OAForum@arl.org></a>,
LibLicense-L Discussion Forum
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:LIBLICENSE-L@listserv.crl.edu"><LIBLICENSE-L@listserv.crl.edu></a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<br>
<br>
<div dir="ltr">
<div class=""
style="font-family:verdana,arial,helvetica,sans-serif;color:rgb(51,51,51);font-size:13px">Business,
Innovation and Skills Committee Select Committee <br>
Announcement No.21<br>
Monday 9 September 2013<br>
<br>
NEW REPORT: <em><strong>Open Access: achieving a functional
market</strong></em><br>
<em>Under strict embargo until 00.01 BST on Tuesday 10
September</em><br>
<br>
<strong><a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.parliament.uk/business/committees/committees-a-z/commons-select/business-innovation-and-skills/news/publ-open-access/"
style="color:rgb(0,51,102)">Government mistaken in
focusing on Gold as route to full open access, says
Committee</a></strong><br>
<br>
The Government’s commitment to increasing access to published
research findings, and its desire to achieve full open access,
are welcome, says the Business, Innovation and Skills
Committee in a Report published today. However, whilst Gold
open access is a desirable ultimate goal, focusing on it
during the transition to a fully open access world is a
mistake, says the Report. <br>
<br>
The Report calls on the Government and RCUK to reconsider
their preference for Gold open access during the five year
transition period, and give due regard to the evidence of the
vital role that Green open access and repositories have to
play as the UK moves towards full open access. <br>
<br>
The Report recommends that:
<blockquote>• the Government should take an active role in
promoting standardisation and compliance across subject and
institutional repositories [paragraph 25].<br>
<br>
• RCUK should reinstate and strengthen the immediate deposit
mandate in its original policy and improve the monitoring
and enforcement of mandated deposit [paragraph 31].<br>
<br>
• the Government and RCUK should revise their policies to
place an upper limit of 6 month embargoes on STEM subject
research and up to 12 month embargoes for HASS subject
research [paragraph 50].<br>
<br>
• the Government should mitigate against the impact on
universities of paying Article Processing Charges out of
their own reserves [paragraph 64].<br>
<br>
• if the preference for Gold is maintained, the Government
and RCUK should amend their policies so that APCs are only
paid to publishers of pure Gold rather than hybrid journals
to eliminate the risk of double-dipping [paragraph 77].<br>
</blockquote>
<div><br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<br>
</div>
<br>
</body>
</html>